kyse30 human escc cell line (Servicebio Inc)
Structured Review

Kyse30 Human Escc Cell Line, supplied by Servicebio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/kyse30+human+escc+cell+line/pmc13006417-78-0-6?v=Servicebio+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Spatial omics study reveals molecular-cellular dynamics of tumor ecosystem in esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma initiation and progression"
Article Title: Spatial omics study reveals molecular-cellular dynamics of tumor ecosystem in esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma initiation and progression
Journal: Cell Reports Medicine
doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2026.102650
Figure Legend Snippet: Spatial whole-transcriptome profiling of ESPL and ESCC samples (A) Workflow of DSP experimental process. (B) The UMAP plot displaying the clustering results of AOIs from different compartments at multiple stages of ESCC. (C) The heatmap displaying the expression levels of AOI characteristic markers RNA in different compartments. (D) The boxplots showing the expression levels of marker genes in five different compartments at different stages of ESCC. Box plot shows the median and interquartile range, whiskers extend to 1.5 × IQR. DSP, digital spatial profiling; UMAP, uniform manifold approximation and projection; AOI, area of interest; EP, epithelial-cell-enriched; MC, macrophage-cell-enriched; NC, neutrophil-cell-enriched; ST, stroma-enriched; LS, lymphoid structure; CAFs, cancer-associated fibroblasts; ESPL, esophageal squamous precancerous lesion; non-mESCC, non-metastasis esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; mESCC, metastasis esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; mLN, lymph node metastasis tissues.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Marker
Figure Legend Snippet: Changes in gene expression patterns in the EP compartment during the initiation of ESCC (A) Volcano plot showed significant DEGs during the formation of ESPL. (B) Pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs in ESPL and normal stages. (C) Changes in gene expression across epidermis development and keratinocyte differentiation pathways during ESPL formation. (D) Interaction plot of ESPL-formation-related genes. Each circle represents a protein, and the interactions are connected by solid lines. The types of interactions were shown on the right side of the figure. (E) The four-quadrant plot illustrates the significant differences in gene expression patterns among four distinct types during the initiation of ESCC. (F) The boxplot shows the expression levels of the presented genes across the four patterns during ESCC initiation. Pattern 1 to 4 were tagged in blue, pink, yellow, and purple, respectively. Box plot shows the interquartile, whiskers extend to1.5 × IQR. (G) Pathway enrichment results for genes in the four patterns. (H) The line graph depicts changes in the signature scores of the indicated pathways during the initiation and development of ESCC. DEGs, differentially expressed genes.
Techniques Used: Gene Expression, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: Spatial transcriptome analysis of the TME during ESCC initiation process (A) Quantitative analysis of immune cells in non-EP compartments during the initiation process of ESCC using TME_consense algorithm. (B) Comparison of B, plasma, CD4 + T, and CD8 + T cells during the initiation process of ESCC. (C) Analyze the immune cell changes in non-EP compartments during the initiation process of ESCC using SpatialDecon algorithm. (D) mIF staining of CD20, CD8, and CD4 on tumor tissues in ESCC initiation stages. Scale bar, 200 μm. (E) Comparison of the percentages of CD20-, CD8-, and CD4-positive cells across the ESCC initiation stages. (F) Pathway enrichment analysis of significantly differential expression genes in non-EP compartments during the initial stage of ESCC. (G) The heatmap shows the differential genes in the MC and NC compartments during the initial stage of ESCC. (H) Comparison of the proportion of tumor-associated macrophage and neutrophile cells across the ESCC development. (I) The heatmap shows the differential genes in TLS compartments during the initial stage of ESCC. (J) mIF staining on TLS compartment of ESCC initiation stage. Scale bar, 100 μm. (K) Comparison of the percentages of APOBEC3A-positive cells between ESPL and non-mESCC stages in the TLS. NE, normal epithelia; ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; mIF, multiplex immunofluorescence; MC, macrophage-cell-enriched compartment; NC, neutrophil-cell-enriched compartment; TLS, tertiary lymphoid structures. Box plots show the median and interquartile range, whiskers extend to 1.5×IQR. ∗p < 0.05 , ∗∗ p < 0.01,∗∗∗ p < 0.001, p values were calculated using a two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
Techniques Used: Comparison, Clinical Proteomics, Staining, Quantitative Proteomics, Multiplex Assay, Immunofluorescence
Figure Legend Snippet: Characteristic changes in transcription patterns during the progression of ESCC (A) The volcano plot shows significant differences in genes between the early (ESPL and non-mESCC) and advanced (mESCC and mLN) stages of ESCC. (B) Pathway enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes in the early and advanced stages of ESCC. (C) The gene expression levels associated with significantly enriched pathways throughout the occurrence and development of ESCC. (D) mIF staining of CCND1, LAMB1, and IL-18 on ESCC tissues. Scale bar, 200 μm. (E) Comparison of the percentages of CCND1, LAMB1, and IL-18-positive cells on ESCC tissues. Box plots show the median and interquartile range, whiskers extend to 1.5 × IQR. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, p values were calculated using a two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test. (F) The heatmap of gradient-changed DEGs based on pseudotime and ESCC progression of EP.
Techniques Used: Gene Expression, Staining, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: OGT promotes ESCC progression through regulating proliferation, migration, invasion, and apoptosis in vitro and in vivo (A) Representative images of immunohistochemical staining for OGT in cancer and adjacent tissues, magnified at 200× and 400×; scale bars, 100 μm. (B) Paired comparison of OGT IHC scores in tumor and peritumor tissues. p value was calculated using a two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test (paired samples, n = 76). (C) Representative WB images of OGT and O-GlcNAc level in all transient transfection groups, including knockdown in KYSE30 and KYSE450 (transfected with siNC, si OGT #1, or si OGT #2) and overexpress in KYSE150 and KYSE410 (transfected with oeVector, oe OGT , or oe OGT and treated with OSMI-1). Images are representative of three independent experiments ( n = 3). (D) OGT and O-GlcNAc level in lentiviral-mediated knockdown KYSE450 and overexpress KYSE150. Representative protein images of three independent experiments were shown ( n = 3). (E and F) Representative images and quantification of plate clone formation assay of lentiviral-mediated knockdown KYSE450 and overexpress KYSE150 cell lines. Data are mean ± SD from three independent experiments ( n = 3). p values were calculated using one-way ANOVA. (G) Cell proliferation measured by the CCK8 assay and relative cell proliferation quantified by OD value at 450 nm of KYSE30, KYSE450, KYSE150, and KYSE410 cell lines. Data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent experiments ( n = 3). p values were calculated using two-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple-comparisons test. (H) Representative images of cell migration and invasion assays in the KYSE30, KYSE450, KYSE150, and KYSE410 cell lines ( n = 3). Scale bars, 200 μm. (I) Stably transfected shNC/sh OGT KYSE450 cell subcutaneously injected into nude mice. Representative image of xenograft tumors and tumor volume from day 5 to day 30. Data are presented as mean ± SD, n = 5 mice per group. p values were calculated using two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Sidak's multiple-comparisons test. (J) Bioluminescence imaging of lung metastatic foci at the 7th week in a lung metastasis model. Luciferase activity is measured in photons per cm2 per second per steradian (p/s/cm2/sr). (K) Representative images and quantitative analysis of metastasis nodules on the lung surface. Arrowheads denote the metastasis nodules on the lung surface. (L) Representative images of HE staining of lung metastasis and quantitative analysis of lung metastasis area. Arrowheads denote the metastasis nodules. Scale bars, 200 μm. (J–L) Data are presented as mean ± SD, n = 5 mice per group. p values were calculated using a two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test. (M) The results of enriched pathways affected by OGT expression detected across different omics. In the RNA-seq dataset, siOGT cells were defined as the OGT low group, while siNC cells were defined as the OGT-high group. In both the proteomic and glycoproteomic datasets, oeVector cells were defined as the OGT-low group, and oeOGT cells were defined as the OGT-high group. Pathways activated in the OGT-high group are marked in green, while pathways inhibited are marked in red. (N) Comparison of apoptosis rate between KYSE450 siNC and si OGT groups. Data are presented as mean ± SD, n = 3 per group. p values were calculated using unpaired Student's t test. (O) Flow cytometry analysis of cell cycle distribution of KYSE450 cells across siNC and si OGT . ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. NC, negative control group.
Techniques Used: Migration, In Vitro, In Vivo, Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Comparison, Transfection, Knockdown, Tube Formation Assay, CCK-8 Assay, Stable Transfection, Injection, Imaging, Luciferase, Activity Assay, Expressing, RNA Sequencing, Flow Cytometry, Negative Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Changes in TME during the progression of ESCC (A) Abundance of 17 cells estimated by SpatialDecon algorithm in non-EP compartments between the early (ESPL and non-mESCC) and advanced stages (mESCC and mLN) of ESCC. (B) Comparison of proportion of presented cells between the early and advanced stages of ESCC. Box plot shows the median and interquartile range, whiskers extend to 1.5 × IQR. p values were calculated using two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. (C) Volcano plot showing the DEGs between early and advanced stages in ST compartment. (D) Volcano plot showing the DEGs between early and advanced stages in MC compartment. (E) Volcano plot showing the DEGs between early and advanced stages in NC compartment. (F) Cell-cell interactions based on significant ligand-receptor pairs in advanced stages of ESCC. (G) Interaction relationships of the ACTIVIN, CHEMERIN, and PERIOSTIN pathways among compartments in advanced ESCC. (H) Cell-cell interactions between ST compartments and other compartments via the ACTIVIN, CHEMERIN, and PERIOSTIN pathways during ESCC initiation and progression. (I) The four-quadrant diagram showed the significant differences in gene expression patterns among three different types in the TLS during the ESCC process. Genes showing continuous increase were marked in red, while genes showing continuous decrease were marked in blue. (J) Volcano plot showed significant differentially expressed genes between the TLS of tumor and the lymph follicles of lymph nodules.
Techniques Used: Comparison, Gene Expression


